Overview

Row

Overview

2023 Utah Moves Transportation Follow-On Survey: Unweighted Codebook and Dataset Guide

This document provides key information about all variables included in the Utah Moves Transportation Follow-On Survey dataset. This includes:

A codebook with all variable and value labels, searchable by data table.
Weighted frequency tables with tabulations for all categorical variables in the dataset, split by sample source.
A dataset guide with information about data privacy and notes on joining tables. In many cases, referring to the original survey questionnaire also provides helpful context for the exact data collection procedures.

In addition to the items listed above, the dataset guide for the spring household travel survey can be found here and the interactive data visualization tool can be found here.

Dataset Composition

The final dataset includes three distinct data tables. These tables include all user-input survey variables, unique identifiers from the spring household travel survey (e.g., hh_id, person_id), and other variables from the spring household travel survey to be used to weight these data (e.g., income_broad). The full household travel survey dataset guide can be viewed here.

Table	Rows
Household	3,250 complete households
Person	8,863 people
Trip	6,396 trips

Data Privacy

The survey dataset contains sensitive and confidential data, including personally identifiable information (PII). Please follow your organization’s privacy policy, this survey’s privacy policy, and generally accepted best practices for data privacy and security.

RSG has removed any PII used solely for survey administration from the final dataset. Additionally, survey access codes used by participants have been replaced with household IDs (hh_id) to ensure that no information in the final dataset can be identified using the passwords the participant used.

Using The Data

Column

Joining Tables

Survey data tables can be joined to one another as follows:

Table name	Variable(s) to join to other survey data tables
Household	hh_id
Person	hh_id, person_id
Trip	hh_id, person_id

Missing Values

A survey data table cell may be missing data for one of three reasons:

1. Value or response is missing due to survey logic, participant non-response, or error.

Example: Persons without internet access are not asked how satisfied they are with their internet speeds.

Coded as: 995 for categorical variables, blank/NA for continuous variables

2. A respondent indicated that their response was not on the list of provided answer options.

Example: Some participants have a preferred home type outside of the available options.

Coded as: 997 (Other)

3. A respondent indicated that they didn’t know the answer and skipped that question.

Example: Some participants are unsure of how many long distance trips they made in the past 30 days.

Coded as: 998 (Don’t know)

Data Visualization

In addition to this dataset guide, data users can interact these data and data from the household travel survey here.

With this tool, users can:

View additional data summaries (e.g., mode share by household income)
Create custom cross tabs/tables
Create custom maps
View origin and destination flows
Learn more about how the survey data was collected and how to interpret the findings

Codebook

Row

Variable Descriptions

Table

Variable Values

Household

Row

sample_segment

Sample segment (appended from HTS)

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Box Elder, Tooele, and Juab-General	1	86	35,350	2.6%	3.1%
Box Elder, Tooele, and Juab-Hard-to-survey	2	12	4,066	0.4%	0.4%
Box Elder, Tooele, and Juab-Walk/Bike/Transit	3	14	6,074	0.4%	0.5%
Cache-General	4	137	26,328	4.2%	2.3%
Cache-Hard-to-survey	5	37	6,696	1.1%	0.6%
Cache-Walk/Bike/Transit	6	65	8,824	2.0%	0.8%
Davis-General	7	217	94,118	6.7%	8.3%
Davis-Hard-to-survey	8	13	6,651	0.4%	0.6%
Davis-Walk/Bike/Transit	9	30	9,595	0.9%	0.8%
Iron-General	10	84	21,045	2.6%	1.9%
Iron-Hard-to-survey	11	14	4,540	0.4%	0.4%
Iron-Walk/Bike/Transit	12	21	2,814	0.6%	0.2%
Morgan, Summit, and Wasatch-General	13	91	35,669	2.8%	3.2%
Morgan, Summit, and Wasatch-Hard-to-survey	14	2	438	0.1%	0.0%
Morgan, Summit, and Wasatch-Walk/Bike/Transit	15	8	2,216	0.2%	0.2%
Salt Lake-General	16	499	218,497	15.4%	19.3%
Salt Lake-Hard-to-survey	17	198	102,531	6.1%	9.1%
Salt Lake-Walk/Bike/Transit	18	316	67,070	9.7%	5.9%
Utah-General	19	366	162,521	11.3%	14.4%
Utah-Hard-to-survey	20	89	13,847	2.7%	1.2%
Utah-Walk/Bike/Transit	21	105	10,665	3.2%	0.9%
Washington-General	22	139	54,236	4.3%	4.8%
Washington-Hard-to-survey	23	16	9,605	0.5%	0.8%
Washington-Walk/Bike/Transit	24	35	8,323	1.1%	0.7%
Weber-General	25	142	61,582	4.4%	5.4%
Weber-Hard-to-survey	26	29	12,064	0.9%	1.1%
Weber-Walk/Bike/Transit	27	58	14,577	1.8%	1.3%
All other counties-General	28	24	23,944	0.7%	2.1%
All other counties-Hard-to-survey	29	12	10,028	0.4%	0.9%
All other counties-Walk/Bike/Transit	30	18	7,706	0.6%	0.7%
University	31	316	71,435	9.7%	6.3%
Supplemental	32	57	19,055	1.8%	1.7%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,110	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Row

num_people

Household size (appended from HTS)

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
1 person	1	771	341,319	23.7%	30.1%
2 people	2	1,161	321,971	35.7%	28.4%
3 people	3	414	156,713	12.7%	13.8%
4 people	4	398	137,482	12.2%	12.1%
5 people	5	228	74,235	7.0%	6.6%
6 people	6	195	67,533	6.0%	6.0%
7 people	7	53	21,240	1.6%	1.9%
8 people	8	22	9,972	0.7%	0.9%
9 people	9	6	1,082	0.2%	0.1%
12 people	12	1	174	0.0%	0.0%
13 or more people	13	1	389	0.0%	0.0%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,110	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Row

num_surveyable

Number of surveyable persons (appended from HTS)

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
1 surveyable person	1	975	365,781	30.0%	32.3%
2 surveyable persons	2	1,121	323,955	34.5%	28.6%
3 surveyable persons	3	365	149,264	11.2%	13.2%
4 surveyable persons	4	337	125,641	10.4%	11.1%
5 surveyable persons	5	217	76,528	6.7%	6.8%
7 surveyable persons	6	157	58,981	4.8%	5.2%
8 surveyable persons	7	50	20,456	1.5%	1.8%
9 surveyable persons	8	22	10,753	0.7%	0.9%
9 surveyable persons	9	4	187	0.1%	0.0%
12 surveyable persons	12	1	174	0.0%	0.0%
13 or more surveyable persons	13	1	389	0.0%	0.0%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

num_kids

Number of children in household (age 0-17) (appended from HTS)

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 children	0	2,228	752,301	68.6%	66.5%
1 child	1	331	137,202	10.2%	12.1%
2 children	2	321	108,504	9.9%	9.6%
3 children	3	186	63,001	5.7%	5.6%
4 children	4	130	52,870	4.0%	4.7%
5 children	5	39	14,502	1.2%	1.3%
6 children	6	12	3,265	0.4%	0.3%
7 children	7	2	75	0.1%	0.0%
8 children	8	1	389	0.0%	0.0%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

num_workers

Number of workers in household (employed full-time, employed part-time, self-employed, or volunteer/unpaid intern) (appended from HTS)

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 (No workers)	0	640	196,030	19.7%	17.3%
1 worker	1	1,222	448,430	37.6%	39.6%
2 workers	2	1,070	363,863	32.9%	32.1%
3 workers	3	200	98,784	6.2%	8.7%
4 workers	4	85	21,347	2.6%	1.9%
5 workers	5	20	2,150	0.6%	0.2%
6 workers	6	11	1,248	0.3%	0.1%
7 workers	7	1	84	0.0%	0.0%
11 workers	11	1	174	0.0%	0.0%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,110	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Row

num_vehicles

Number of vehicles in household (appended from HTS)

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 (no vehicles in household)	0	228	65,098	7.0%	5.8%
1 vehicle	1	1,103	332,500	33.9%	29.4%
2 vehicles	2	1,343	468,738	41.3%	41.4%
3 vehicles	3	401	186,304	12.3%	16.5%
4 vehicles	4	106	52,269	3.3%	4.6%
5 vehicles	5	47	21,190	1.4%	1.9%
6 vehicles	6	16	4,937	0.5%	0.4%
7 vehicles	7	4	582	0.1%	0.1%
8 or more vehicles	8	2	490	0.1%	0.0%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,108	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,108

Row

income_broad

Household’s total annual income last year – broad categories (appended from HTS)

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Under $25,000	1	514	117,510	15.8%	10.4%
$25,000-$49,999	2	511	170,058	15.7%	15.0%
$50,000-$74,999	3	567	170,615	17.4%	15.1%
$75,000-$99,999	4	491	165,809	15.1%	14.6%
$100,000-$199,999	5	770	304,542	23.7%	26.9%
$200,000 or more	6	200	117,867	6.2%	10.4%
Prefer not to answer	999	197	85,708	6.1%	7.6%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

income_imputed

Household’s total annual income last year – imputed values

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
	$100,000-$199,999	847	342,063	26.1%	30.2%
	$200,000 or more	202	119,744	6.2%	10.6%
	$25,000-$49,999	527	180,098	16.2%	15.9%
	$50,000-$74,999	649	196,850	20.0%	17.4%
	$75,000-$99,999	491	165,809	15.1%	14.6%
	Under $25,000	534	127,544	16.4%	11.3%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,108	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,108

Row

residence_rent_own

Current residence ownership (appended from HTS) Asked rMove day 4

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Own home or paying a mortgage	1	1,978	764,034	62.2%	68.2%
Rent	2	1,082	298,865	34.0%	26.7%
Housing provided by job or military	3	2	189	0.1%	0.0%
Provided by family, relative, or friend without payment or rent	4	83	32,850	2.6%	2.9%
Other	997	8	3,640	0.3%	0.3%
Prefer not to answer	999	29	21,212	0.9%	1.9%
Missing Response	995	68	11,319
Total valid		3,182	1,120,790	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		68	11,319
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

res_type

Type of current residence (appended from HTS)

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Single-family house (detached house)	1	1,926	735,633	59.3%	65.0%
Single-family house attached to one or more houses (rowhouse or townhouse)	2	276	113,792	8.5%	10.1%
Building with 2-4 units (duplexes, triplexes, quads, not age-restricted)	3	251	67,986	7.7%	6.0%
Building with 5-49 apartments/condos (not age-restricted)	4	436	104,209	13.4%	9.2%
Building with 50 or more apartments/condos (not age-restricted)	5	203	63,273	6.2%	5.6%
Senior or age-restricted apartments/condos	6	48	13,630	1.5%	1.2%
Manufactured home/mobile home/trailer	7	28	11,780	0.9%	1.0%
Dorm, group quarters, or institutional housing	8	77	13,446	2.4%	1.2%
Other (e.g., boat, RV, van)	9	5	8,359	0.2%	0.7%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,108	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,108

Row

commute_pref

Commute preference

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Having a reliable commute time without occasional delays is most important to me.	1	1,798	612,803	55.3%	54.1%
Having a faster commute time, but with occasional delays is most important to me.	2	500	194,634	15.4%	17.2%
N/A – I don’t commute to a workplace outside the home.	3	952	324,672	29.3%	28.7%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

congestion_pref

Road congestion preference

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
We need to build more roads and expand existing roads to accommodate increased traffic congestion resulting from new economic and population growth.	1	1,891	705,227	58.2%	62.3%
Building more roads and expanding existing roads will just encourage more people to drive more and may even make traffic congestion worse.	2	1,359	426,883	41.8%	37.7%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,110	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Row

speed_pref

Nearby road speed preference

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Much faster	1	126	51,070	3.9%	4.5%
Faster	2	556	197,132	17.1%	17.4%
About the same	3	2,202	780,216	67.8%	68.9%
Slower	4	298	81,417	9.2%	7.2%
Much slower	5	68	22,274	2.1%	2.0%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

investment_1

Dollars invested in new and expanded roadways out of 100 available for all nine investment categories

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	10.000	14.349	0	100	1,132,109.143	0.000	3,250	0

Row

investment_2

Dollars invested in roadway safety and efficiency projects out of 100 available for all nine investment categories

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	10.000	12.236	0	100	1,132,109.143	0.000	3,250	0

Row

investment_3

Dollars invested in roadway maintenance projects out of 100 available for all nine investment categories

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	15.000	17.604	10	100	1,132,109.143	0.000	3,250	0

Row

investment_4

Dollars invested in expand transit system’s geographic coverage including on-demand transit service out of 100 available for all nine investment categories

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	10.000	12.816	0	100	1,132,109.143	0.000	3,250	0

Row

investment_5

Dollars invested in offer more frequent transit service out of 100 available for all nine investment categories

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	5.000	8.942	0	100	1,132,109.143	0.000	3,250	0

Row

investment_6

Dollars invested in eliminate transit fares to grow ridership out of 100 available for all nine investment categories

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	5.000	8.478	0	100	1,132,109.143	0.000	3,250	0

Row

investment_7

Dollars invested in expand regional network of bike and pedestrian trails and pathways out of 100 available for all nine investment categories

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	5.000	7.838	0	100	1,132,109.143	0.000	3,250	0

Row

investment_8

Dollars invested in expand local, neighborhood network bike and pedestrian trails and pathways out of 100 available for all nine investment categories

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	7.000	9.339	0	100	1,132,109.143	0.000	3,250	0

Row

investment_9

Dollars invested in neighborhood sidewalks and crosswalks out of 100 available for all nine investment categories

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	5.000	8.312	0	100	1,132,109.143	0.000	3,250	0

Row

new_home_type

New home type preference

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
A detached, single-family house where I need to drive to shops/restaurants and have a longer commute to work	1	2,027	734,206	62.4%	64.9%
An apartment or townhouse where I have an easy walk to shops/restaurants have a shorter commute to work	2	1,223	397,903	37.6%	35.1%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

current_home_loc

Current home location

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
City, downtown or urban center with a mix of offices, housing types, and shops	1	370	93,525	11.4%	8.3%
City, residential neighborhood	2	799	256,551	24.6%	22.7%
Suburban neighborhood, with a mix of homes, shops, and businesses	3	650	236,133	20.0%	20.9%
Suburban neighborhood, with houses only	4	1,014	379,637	31.2%	33.5%
Small town	5	277	121,498	8.5%	10.7%
Rural area	6	140	44,766	4.3%	4.0%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,110	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Row

pref_home_loc

Ideal home location

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
City, downtown or urban center with a mix of offices, housing types, and shops	1	371	108,500	11.4%	9.6%
City, residential neighborhood	2	402	144,015	12.4%	12.7%
Suburban neighborhood, with a mix of homes, shops, and businesses	3	1,152	411,962	35.4%	36.4%
Suburban neighborhood, with houses only	4	530	176,440	16.3%	15.6%
Small town	5	470	169,882	14.5%	15.0%
Rural area	6	325	121,311	10.0%	10.7%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,110	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Row

current_home_type

Current housing type

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Single-family house (detached house)	1	1,992	759,259	61.3%	67.1%
Townhouse (attached house)	2	311	124,437	9.6%	11.0%
Building with 3 or fewer apartments or condos	4	128	32,181	3.9%	2.8%
Building with 4 or more apartments or condos	5	724	186,482	22.3%	16.5%
Mobile home or trailer	6	25	11,655	0.8%	1.0%
Dormitory or other institutional housing	7	56	13,800	1.7%	1.2%
Other (including RV, van, tiny home, etc.)	997	14	4,294	0.4%	0.4%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,108	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,108

Row

pref_home_type

Ideal housing type

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Single-family house (detached house)	1	2,674	925,641	82.3%	81.8%
Townhouse (attached house)	2	270	93,269	8.3%	8.2%
Building with 3 or fewer apartments or condos	4	103	35,946	3.2%	3.2%
Building with 4 or more apartments or condos	5	153	52,194	4.7%	4.6%
Mobile home or trailer	6	10	9,229	0.3%	0.8%
Dormitory or other institutional housing	7	2	1,622	0.1%	0.1%
Other (including RV, van, tiny home, etc.)	997	38	14,208	1.2%	1.3%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

trip_purpose

Purpose of most recent forsaken trip

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Dine out, get coffee, or take-out	1	289	130,393	8.9%	11.5%
Grocery shopping	2	606	207,968	18.6%	18.4%
Other routine shopping (for example: pharmacy)	3	227	87,468	7.0%	7.7%
Medical visit (for example: doctor, dentist)	4	59	18,456	1.8%	1.6%
Other errand	5	220	71,448	6.8%	6.3%
Social activity (for example: visit friends or relatives)	6	276	88,858	8.5%	7.8%
Family activity (for example: watch child’s game)	7	65	19,309	2.0%	1.7%
Leisure, entertainment, or cultural activity (for example: cinema, museum, park)	8	263	85,074	8.1%	7.5%
Religious, civic, volunteer activity	9	49	13,620	1.5%	1.2%
Pick someone up or drop someone off	10	29	9,507	0.9%	0.8%
Work related activity	11	125	44,299	3.8%	3.9%
N/A – I was able to make all the trips I wanted to make in the past week	996	988	337,327	30.4%	29.8%
Other, please specify:	997	54	18,382	1.7%	1.6%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

trip_mode

Mode considered for most recent forsaken trip
If trip purpose is not N/A

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)	Missing Total (Unweighted)	Missing Total (Weighted)
Personal motorized vehicle	trip_mode_1	1,925	677,505	85.1%	85.2%	988	337,327
Personal electric bicycle	trip_mode_2	73	19,313	3.2%	2.4%	988	337,327
Personal pedal bicycle	trip_mode_3	134	42,218	5.9%	5.3%	988	337,327
Walk	trip_mode_4	313	91,668	13.8%	11.5%	988	337,327
Transit	trip_mode_5	377	113,507	16.7%	14.3%	988	337,327
Ride-hail service	trip_mode_6	45	15,383	2.0%	1.9%	988	337,327
Taxi Service	trip_mode_7	38	18,844	1.7%	2.4%	988	337,327
Shared e-scooter	trip_mode_8	7	3,584	0.3%	0.5%	988	337,327
Shared e-bike	trip_mode_9	3	2,266	0.1%	0.3%	988	337,327
Other	trip_mode_997	60	22,194	2.7%	2.8%	988	337,327

Row

why_no_vehicle

Why personal motorized vehicles were not used for most recent forsaken trip
If trip mode = personal motorized vehicle

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)	Missing Total (Unweighted)	Missing Total (Weighted)
Do not have a personal motorized vehicle or it was not working	why_no_vehicle_1	68	21,634	3.5%	3.2%	1,325	454,604
Other member(s) of my household were using personalized motorized vehicle	why_no_vehicle_2	202	67,753	10.5%	10.0%	1,325	454,604
Monetary cost was too high	why_no_vehicle_3	325	105,421	16.9%	15.6%	1,325	454,604
Travel time was too long	why_no_vehicle_4	730	234,354	37.9%	34.6%	1,325	454,604
Disability	why_no_vehicle_5	37	16,284	1.9%	2.4%	1,325	454,604
Safety concerns	why_no_vehicle_6	77	21,334	4.0%	3.1%	1,325	454,604
Weather	why_no_vehicle_7	206	74,547	10.7%	11.0%	1,325	454,604
Other	why_no_vehicle_997	591	226,202	30.7%	33.4%	1,325	454,604

Row

why_no_ebike

Why personal electric bicycles were not used for most recent forsaken trip
If trip mode = personal electric bicycle

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)	Missing Total (Unweighted)	Missing Total (Weighted)
Do not have a personal electric bicycle or it was not working	why_no_ebike_1	11	2,932	15.1%	15.2%	3,177	1,112,796
Other member(s) of my household were using personal electric bicycle	why_no_ebike_2	0	0	0.0%	0.0%	3,177	1,112,796
Monetary cost was too high	why_no_ebike_3	1	512	1.4%	2.7%	3,177	1,112,796
Travel time was too long	why_no_ebike_4	15	2,494	20.5%	12.9%	3,177	1,112,796
Disability	why_no_ebike_5	2	481	2.7%	2.5%	3,177	1,112,796
Safety concerns	why_no_ebike_6	23	9,575	31.5%	49.6%	3,177	1,112,796
Weather	why_no_ebike_7	26	6,515	35.6%	33.7%	3,177	1,112,796
Other	why_no_ebike_997	15	2,910	20.5%	15.1%	3,177	1,112,796

Row

why_no_bike

Why personal pedal bicycles were not used for most recent forsaken trip
If trip mode = personal pedal bicycle

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)	Missing Total (Unweighted)	Missing Total (Weighted)
Do not have a personal pedal bicycle or it was not working	why_no_bike_1	6	5,421	4.5%	12.8%	3,116	1,089,891
Other member(s) of my household were using personal pedal bicycle	why_no_bike_2	1	45	0.7%	0.1%	3,116	1,089,891
Monetary cost was too high	why_no_bike_3	4	1,929	3.0%	4.6%	3,116	1,089,891
Travel time was too long	why_no_bike_4	46	10,863	34.3%	25.7%	3,116	1,089,891
Disability	why_no_bike_5	3	141	2.2%	0.3%	3,116	1,089,891
Safety concerns	why_no_bike_6	44	14,098	32.8%	33.4%	3,116	1,089,891
Weather	why_no_bike_7	45	10,778	33.6%	25.5%	3,116	1,089,891
Other	why_no_bike_997	25	5,950	18.7%	14.1%	3,116	1,089,891

Row

why_no_walk

Why didn’t walk for most recent forsaken trip
If trip mode = walk

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)	Missing Total (Unweighted)	Missing Total (Weighted)
Travel time was too long	why_no_walk_1	186	53,248	59.4%	58.1%	2,937	1,040,441
Disability	why_no_walk_2	14	4,462	4.5%	4.9%	2,937	1,040,441
Safety concerns	why_no_walk_3	45	12,587	14.4%	13.7%	2,937	1,040,441
Weather	why_no_walk_4	111	30,798	35.5%	33.6%	2,937	1,040,441
Other	why_no_walk_997	43	13,855	13.7%	15.1%	2,937	1,040,441

Row

why_no_transit

Why transit was not used for most recent forsaken trip
If trip mode = transit

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)	Missing Total (Unweighted)	Missing Total (Weighted)
Transit was out of service	why_no_transit_1	25	6,144	6.6%	5.4%	2,873	1,018,602
Transit stop was not convenient to my origin or destination	why_no_transit_2	186	56,435	49.3%	49.7%	2,873	1,018,602
Monetary cost was too high	why_no_transit_3	32	6,656	8.5%	5.9%	2,873	1,018,602
Travel and wait time was too long	why_no_transit_4	189	55,474	50.1%	48.9%	2,873	1,018,602
Disability	why_no_transit_5	13	7,506	3.4%	6.6%	2,873	1,018,602
Difficulty understanding how to use the system	why_no_transit_6	21	4,499	5.6%	4.0%	2,873	1,018,602
Safety concerns	why_no_transit_7	11	3,000	2.9%	2.6%	2,873	1,018,602
Weather	why_no_transit_8	42	13,786	11.1%	12.1%	2,873	1,018,602
Other	why_no_transit_997	57	17,018	15.1%	15.0%	2,873	1,018,602

Row

why_no_tnc

Why ride-hail services were not used for most recent forsaken trip
If trip mode = ride-hail service

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)	Missing Total (Unweighted)	Missing Total (Weighted)
Ride-hail service was not available	why_no_tnc_1	6	3,425	13.3%	22.3%	3,205	1,116,726
Monetary cost was too high	why_no_tnc_2	31	9,917	68.9%	64.5%	3,205	1,116,726
Travel and wait time was too long	why_no_tnc_3	5	2,106	11.1%	13.7%	3,205	1,116,726
Disability	why_no_tnc_4	3	768	6.7%	5.0%	3,205	1,116,726
Difficulty understanding how to use the system	why_no_tnc_5	3	2,091	6.7%	13.6%	3,205	1,116,726
Safety concerns	why_no_tnc_6	0	0	0.0%	0.0%	3,205	1,116,726
Weather	why_no_tnc_7	1	25	2.2%	0.2%	3,205	1,116,726
Other	why_no_tnc_997	7	1,375	15.6%	8.9%	3,205	1,116,726

Row

why_no_taxi

Why taxi services were not used for most recent forsaken trip
If trip mode = taxi service

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)	Missing Total (Unweighted)	Missing Total (Weighted)
Taxi service was not available	why_no_taxi_1	5	1,464	13.2%	7.8%	3,212	1,113,265
Monetary cost was too high	why_no_taxi_2	25	13,947	65.8%	74.0%	3,212	1,113,265
Travel and wait time was too long	why_no_taxi_3	18	7,064	47.4%	37.5%	3,212	1,113,265
Disability	why_no_taxi_4	3	2,008	7.9%	10.7%	3,212	1,113,265
Safety concerns	why_no_taxi_5	0	0	0.0%	0.0%	3,212	1,113,265
Weather	why_no_taxi_6	4	1,126	10.5%	6.0%	3,212	1,113,265
Other	why_no_taxi_997	3	1,695	7.9%	9.0%	3,212	1,113,265

Row

why_no_shared_escooter

Why shared e-scooters were not used for most recent forsaken trip
If trip mode = shared e-scooter

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)	Missing Total (Unweighted)	Missing Total (Weighted)
Shared e-scooter was not available	why_no_shared_escooter_1	1	449	14.3%	12.5%	3,243	1,128,525
Pick-up or drop-off station was not convenient to my origin or destination	why_no_shared_escooter_2	2	1,505	28.6%	42.0%	3,243	1,128,525
Monetary cost was too high	why_no_shared_escooter_3	2	1,046	28.6%	29.2%	3,243	1,128,525
Travel time was too long	why_no_shared_escooter_4	3	2,035	42.9%	56.8%	3,243	1,128,525
Disability	why_no_shared_escooter_5	0	0	0.0%	0.0%	3,243	1,128,525
Safety concerns	why_no_shared_escooter_6	1	433	14.3%	12.1%	3,243	1,128,525
Weather	why_no_shared_escooter_7	2	1,505	28.6%	42.0%	3,243	1,128,525
Other	why_no_shared_escooter_997	0	0	0.0%	0.0%	3,243	1,128,525

Row

why_no_shared_ebike

Why shared e-bikes were not used for most recent forsaken trip
If trip mode = shared e-bike

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)	Missing Total (Unweighted)	Missing Total (Weighted)
Shared e-bike was not available	why_no_shared_ebike_1	0	0	0.0%	0.0%	3,247	1,129,843
Pick-up or drop-off station was not convenient to my origin or destination	why_no_shared_ebike_2	2	2,098	66.7%	92.6%	3,247	1,129,843
Monetary cost was too high	why_no_shared_ebike_3	3	2,266	100.0%	100.0%	3,247	1,129,843
Travel time was too long	why_no_shared_ebike_4	1	1,468	33.3%	64.8%	3,247	1,129,843
Disability	why_no_shared_ebike_5	0	0	0.0%	0.0%	3,247	1,129,843
Safety concerns	why_no_shared_ebike_6	0	0	0.0%	0.0%	3,247	1,129,843
Weather	why_no_shared_ebike_7	1	1,468	33.3%	64.8%	3,247	1,129,843
Other	why_no_shared_ebike_997	0	0	0.0%	0.0%	3,247	1,129,843

Row

transit_commute

Factors to encourage transit use to travel to work

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)
N/A - I do not commute to a workplace outside the home	transit_commute_1	860	295,335	26.5%	26.1%
Lower cost of transit or free transit pass	transit_commute_2	964	301,422	29.7%	26.6%
More reliable transit service	transit_commute_3	916	288,439	28.2%	25.5%
More frequent transit service	transit_commute_4	1,303	419,428	40.1%	37.0%
Faster arrival at my destination	transit_commute_5	1,187	398,777	36.5%	35.2%
Transit service provided during different times of the day/week	transit_commute_6	635	208,459	19.5%	18.4%
Transit stops closer to my home/work	transit_commute_7	1,394	503,259	42.9%	44.5%
Higher gas or parking prices	transit_commute_8	350	95,952	10.8%	8.5%
User-friendly transit mobile app	transit_commute_9	547	162,403	16.8%	14.3%
Safer environment in the vehicles	transit_commute_10	344	118,936	10.6%	10.5%
Safer environment at the stops and stations	transit_commute_11	484	167,152	14.9%	14.8%
Other	transit_commute_997	153	45,688	4.7%	4.0%

Row

bike_commute

Factors to encourage bike use to travel to work

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)
N/A - I do not commute to a workplace outside the home	bike_commute_1	911	307,368	28.0%	27.1%
Safer physical riding conditions for bicyclists (e.g., bike paths separated from motor vehicles)	bike_commute_2	1,235	386,925	38.0%	34.2%
An expanded bike network with more routes between my origin and destination	bike_commute_3	443	138,812	13.6%	12.3%
Better knowledge of the best bike route to work	bike_commute_4	486	140,969	15.0%	12.5%
Amenities like showers and a place to change clothes at work	bike_commute_5	629	187,311	19.4%	16.5%
Secure bike storage at work	bike_commute_6	488	155,572	15.0%	13.7%
More attractive routes (visually pleasing, improve non-traffic related safety)	bike_commute_7	533	164,184	16.4%	14.5%
Lower cost electric bikes or similar equipment (e.g., electric scooters)	bike_commute_8	156	54,025	4.8%	4.8%
Expanded bike share system	bike_commute_9	623	188,879	19.2%	16.7%
Better maintenance of existing bicycle infrastructure (e.g., clearing paths of debris and/or snow during the winter)	bike_commute_10	367	117,161	11.3%	10.3%
Transportation back-up option while at work (e.g., reimbursement for taxi or ride-hailing in case of needing to pick up a family member in case of emergency)	bike_commute_11	351	101,699	10.8%	9.0%
Don't have access to a bike, but may in the future	bike_commute_12	205	84,573	6.3%	7.5%
Don't have access to a bike and will not in the future	bike_commute_13	276	111,851	8.5%	9.9%
Other	bike_commute_997	335	139,076	10.3%	12.3%

Row

hh_bicycles_1

How many working electric mountain bikes, adult-sized bicycles owned in household

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 bicycles	1	3,035	1,049,133	93.4%	92.7%
1 bicycle	2	140	50,507	4.3%	4.5%
2 bicycles	3	59	22,901	1.8%	2.0%
3 bicycles	4	6	1,972	0.2%	0.2%
4 bicycles	5	6	4,047	0.2%	0.4%
5 or more bicycles	6	4	3,549	0.1%	0.3%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

hh_bicycles_2

How many working other electric bikes (road, commuter, cargo, etc.) bicycles owned in household

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 bicycles	1	2,951	1,034,673	90.8%	91.4%
1 bicycle	2	188	59,333	5.8%	5.2%
2 bicycles	3	87	28,053	2.7%	2.5%
3 bicycles	4	13	2,361	0.4%	0.2%
4 bicycles	5	5	3,523	0.2%	0.3%
5 or more bicycles	6	6	4,167	0.2%	0.4%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,110	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Row

hh_bicycles_3

How many working mountain bikes, adult sized (non e-bike) bicycles owned in household

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 bicycles	1	1,958	678,401	60.2%	59.9%
1 bicycle	2	644	208,971	19.8%	18.5%
2 bicycles	3	432	157,766	13.3%	13.9%
3 bicycles	4	135	48,186	4.2%	4.3%
4 bicycles	5	45	21,565	1.4%	1.9%
5 or more bicycles	6	36	17,220	1.1%	1.5%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

hh_bicycles_4

How many working other adult-sized bikes (road, commuter, cargo, etc.) bicycles owned in household

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 bicycles	1	1,900	670,444	58.5%	59.2%
1 bicycle	2	738	261,362	22.7%	23.1%
2 bicycles	3	427	137,401	13.1%	12.1%
3 bicycles	4	111	32,890	3.4%	2.9%
4 bicycles	5	39	14,680	1.2%	1.3%
5 or more bicycles	6	35	15,333	1.1%	1.4%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,110	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Row

hh_bicycles_5

How many working child-sized mountain bikes bicycles owned in household

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 bicycles	1	2,927	1,006,622	90.1%	88.9%
1 bicycle	2	185	69,381	5.7%	6.1%
2 bicycles	3	93	40,965	2.9%	3.6%
3 bicycles	4	28	8,695	0.9%	0.8%
4 bicycles	5	11	3,976	0.3%	0.4%
5 or more bicycles	6	6	2,470	0.2%	0.2%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

hh_bicycles_6

How many working other child-sized bikes bicycles owned in household

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 bicycles	1	2,535	899,012	78.0%	79.4%
1 bicycle	2	334	110,308	10.3%	9.7%
2 bicycles	3	208	65,440	6.4%	5.8%
3 bicycles	4	107	33,239	3.3%	2.9%
4 bicycles	5	36	14,871	1.1%	1.3%
5 or more bicycles	6	30	9,239	0.9%	0.8%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

hh_bike_cost

How much spent on purchasing bicycles If household has any bikes

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
No cost	1	234	71,075	10.2%	8.9%
Under $100	2	145	50,350	6.3%	6.3%
$100 - $249.99	3	99	31,974	4.3%	4.0%
$250 - $499.99	4	108	39,885	4.7%	5.0%
$500 - $999.99	5	126	36,387	5.5%	4.6%
$1,000 - $2,499.99	6	88	31,473	3.8%	3.9%
$2,500 or more	7	1,491	537,882	65.1%	67.3%
Missing Response	995	959	333,084
Total valid		2,291	799,026	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		959	333,084
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Row

hh_bike_accessories_cost

How much spent on bicycle maintenance, equipment, and accessories If household has any bikes

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
No cost	1	968	321,387	42.3%	40.2%
Under $100	2	337	109,910	14.7%	13.8%
$100 - $249.99	3	107	34,817	4.7%	4.4%
$250 - $499.99	4	51	16,423	2.2%	2.1%
$500 - $999.99	5	15	5,249	0.7%	0.7%
$1,000 - $2,499.99	6	10	3,875	0.4%	0.5%
$2,500 or more	7	803	307,365	35.1%	38.5%
Missing Response	995	959	333,084
Total valid		2,291	799,026	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		959	333,084
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Row

hh_escooters

How many working e-scooters owned in household

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 e-scooters	1	2,915	1,009,772	89.7%	89.2%
1 e-scooter	2	233	87,134	7.2%	7.7%
2 e-scooters	3	81	28,273	2.5%	2.5%
3 e-scooters	4	16	5,581	0.5%	0.5%
4 e-scooters	5	3	1,192	0.1%	0.1%
5 or more e-scooters	6	2	157	0.1%	0.0%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

ped_safety

If decided against walking or biking due to safety concerns

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Yes	1	991	349,668	30.5%	30.9%
No	2	2,259	782,441	69.5%	69.1%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

ped_safety_concerns

Safety concerns for walking or biking
If did not walk or ride bike because of safety concern

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)	Missing Total (Unweighted)	Missing Total (Weighted)
No safe route to walk or ride my bike	ped_safety_concerns_1	538	203,281	54.3%	58.1%	2,259	782,441
Walking or biking routes don't put enough separation between me and moving cars	ped_safety_concerns_2	619	216,476	62.5%	61.9%	2,259	782,441
Crossing intersections is too stressful	ped_safety_concerns_3	414	155,758	41.8%	44.5%	2,259	782,441
Concerns about distracted or impaired drivers	ped_safety_concerns_4	580	201,876	58.5%	57.7%	2,259	782,441
Speed of vehicle traffic is too high	ped_safety_concerns_5	410	140,585	41.4%	40.2%	2,259	782,441
Mobility impairment increases my exposure to traffic (e.g., trouble walking)	ped_safety_concerns_6	58	32,620	5.9%	9.3%	2,259	782,441
Other	ped_safety_concerns_997	197	60,564	19.9%	17.3%	2,259	782,441

Row

internet_provider

Household primary internet service connection provider

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Cable	1	1,250	460,965	38.5%	40.7%
Fiber optic	2	1,258	407,393	38.7%	36.0%
DSL from landline phone company	3	197	74,185	6.1%	6.6%
Mobile phone provider (for example: LTE, 4G, 5G)	4	247	88,430	7.6%	7.8%
Fixed wireless provider (for example: point-to-point antenna)	5	192	65,614	5.9%	5.8%
Internet service is not available at my current residence location	7	6	1,438	0.2%	0.1%
Internet service is available, but my household chooses not to subscribe	8	26	9,697	0.8%	0.9%
Other	997	74	24,387	2.3%	2.2%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

speed_sat

Satisfaction with speed of home internet service If primary residence has internet service

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Strongly agree	1	1,398	473,801	43.4%	42.3%
Somewhat agree	2	1,125	399,221	35.0%	35.6%
Neutral	3	311	125,201	9.7%	11.2%
Somewhat disagree	4	260	82,933	8.1%	7.4%
Strongly disagree	5	117	36,725	3.6%	3.3%
Don’t know	998	7	3,093	0.2%	0.3%
Missing Response	995	32	11,135
Total valid		3,218	1,120,974	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		32	11,135
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

reliability_sat

Satisfaction with reliability of home internet service If primary residence has internet service

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Strongly agree	1	1,342	463,225	41.7%	41.3%
Somewhat agree	2	1,139	379,920	35.4%	33.9%
Neutral	3	280	114,666	8.7%	10.2%
Somewhat disagree	4	311	111,679	9.7%	10.0%
Strongly disagree	5	140	49,867	4.4%	4.4%
Don’t know	998	6	1,617	0.2%	0.1%
Missing Response	995	32	11,135
Total valid		3,218	1,120,974	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		32	11,135
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

delivery

Household pays for service

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)
Food or grocery delivery program (e.g., Instacart+, HelloFresh)	delivery_1	1,788	615,128	55.0%	54.3%
Retail 'free shipping' subscription programs (e.g., Amazon Prime or Walmart+)	delivery_2	299	103,953	9.2%	9.2%
Prepared meal delivery program (e.g., Uber Eats, Grubhub)	delivery_3	340	131,106	10.5%	11.6%
Other delivery programs	delivery_4	65	21,043	2.0%	1.9%
None of the above	delivery_5	1,316	468,688	40.5%	41.4%

Row

food_delivery_freq

How often used food delivery service in last week

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 times (not at all)	1	2,555	871,218	78.6%	77.0%
1 time	2	391	138,680	12.0%	12.2%
2 times	3	151	57,498	4.6%	5.1%
3 times	4	64	26,573	2.0%	2.3%
4 times	5	48	18,509	1.5%	1.6%
5 times	6	26	10,176	0.8%	0.9%
6 times	7	6	5,430	0.2%	0.5%
7 times	8	4	3,046	0.1%	0.3%
8 times	9	1	449	0.0%	0.0%
9 times	10	1	215	0.0%	0.0%
10 or more times	11	3	316	0.1%	0.0%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,110	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Row

retail_delivery_freq

How often used retail delivery service in last week

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 times (not at all)	1	679	239,669	20.9%	21.2%
1 time	2	752	242,213	23.1%	21.4%
2 times	3	694	245,334	21.4%	21.7%
3 times	4	522	189,084	16.1%	16.7%
4 times	5	248	87,004	7.6%	7.7%
5 times	6	196	62,459	6.0%	5.5%
6 times	7	55	22,018	1.7%	1.9%
7 times	8	26	10,853	0.8%	1.0%
8 times	9	23	14,060	0.7%	1.2%
9 times	10	3	189	0.1%	0.0%
10 or more times	11	52	19,226	1.6%	1.7%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

online_college_freq

How often used in last week online service to take college or university class from home

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 times (not at all)	1	2,606	945,944	80.2%	83.6%
1 time	2	172	42,452	5.3%	3.7%
2 times	3	128	40,372	3.9%	3.6%
3 times	4	89	22,829	2.7%	2.0%
4 times	5	69	21,630	2.1%	1.9%
5 times	6	67	16,619	2.1%	1.5%
6 times	7	17	6,906	0.5%	0.6%
7 times	8	31	13,873	1.0%	1.2%
8 times	9	8	3,122	0.2%	0.3%
9 times	10	5	684	0.2%	0.1%
10 or more times	11	58	17,680	1.8%	1.6%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,111	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,111

Row

online_school_freq

How often in last week used online service to take pre-K - 12 classes from home

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 times (not at all)	1	3,065	1,051,849	94.3%	92.9%
1 time	2	48	16,923	1.5%	1.5%
2 times	3	25	14,110	0.8%	1.2%
3 times	4	18	5,790	0.6%	0.5%
4 times	5	17	14,704	0.5%	1.3%
5 times	6	48	16,988	1.5%	1.5%
6 times	7	7	2,763	0.2%	0.2%
7 times	8	6	1,939	0.2%	0.2%
9 times	10	1	75	0.0%	0.0%
10 or more times	11	15	6,968	0.5%	0.6%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

telehealth_freq

How often used online healthcare service in last week

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 times (not at all)	1	2,778	953,905	85.5%	84.3%
1 time	2	353	128,506	10.9%	11.4%
2 times	3	81	32,204	2.5%	2.8%
3 times	4	23	9,264	0.7%	0.8%
4 times	5	7	4,518	0.2%	0.4%
5 times	6	5	2,846	0.2%	0.3%
6 times	7	2	353	0.1%	0.0%
8 times	9	1	513	0.0%	0.0%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,109	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

online_services_freq

How often used online meetings for non-work, non-medical meetings in last week

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 times (not at all)	1	2,319	814,258	71.4%	71.9%
1 time	2	462	162,947	14.2%	14.4%
2 times	3	224	69,975	6.9%	6.2%
3 times	4	97	28,118	3.0%	2.5%
4 times	5	46	20,872	1.4%	1.8%
5 times	6	45	14,088	1.4%	1.2%
6 times	7	12	2,329	0.4%	0.2%
7 times	8	9	1,379	0.3%	0.1%
8 times	9	4	2,133	0.1%	0.2%
9 times	10	3	4,253	0.1%	0.4%
10 or more times	11	29	11,756	0.9%	1.0%
Total valid		3,250	1,132,108	100.0%	100.0%
Total		3,250	1,132,108

Row

travel_replace_1

How many times household member would have traveled for meals or groceries if an online alternative did not exist If used any services or activities in the past week

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 times (not at all)	0	82	27,990	11.8%	10.7%
1 time	1	423	154,245	60.9%	59.1%
2 times	2	103	39,743	14.8%	15.2%
3 times	3	44	20,028	6.3%	7.7%
4 times	4	30	13,121	4.3%	5.0%
5 times	5	7	2,365	1.0%	0.9%
6 times	8	2	416	0.3%	0.2%
7 times	9	2	2,301	0.3%	0.9%
8 times	10	1	449	0.1%	0.2%
10 or more times	12	1	234	0.1%	0.1%
Missing Response	995	2,555	871,218
Total valid		695	260,892	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		2,555	871,218
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Row

travel_replace_2

How many times household member would have traveled for retail shopping if an online alternative did not exist If used any services or activities in the past week

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 times (not at all)	0	697	218,918	27.1%	24.5%
1 time	1	1,068	376,689	41.5%	42.2%
2 times	2	488	172,646	19.0%	19.3%
3 times	3	204	86,631	7.9%	9.7%
4 times	4	57	20,329	2.2%	2.3%
5 times	5	41	12,151	1.6%	1.4%
6 times	8	5	1,404	0.2%	0.2%
8 times	10	3	373	0.1%	0.0%
10 or more times	12	8	3,299	0.3%	0.4%
Missing Response	995	679	239,669
Total valid		2,571	892,440	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		679	239,669
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

travel_replace_3

How many times household member would have traveled for college or university classes if an online alternative did not exist If used any services or activities in the past week

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 times (not at all)	0	208	63,519	32.3%	34.1%
1 time	1	145	33,981	22.5%	18.3%
2 times	2	103	33,821	16.0%	18.2%
3 times	3	71	19,475	11.0%	10.5%
4 times	4	27	4,696	4.2%	2.5%
5 times	5	48	18,097	7.5%	9.7%
6 times	8	7	3,753	1.1%	2.0%
7 times	9	9	3,063	1.4%	1.6%
8 times	10	2	188	0.3%	0.1%
9 times	11	3	388	0.5%	0.2%
10 or more times	12	21	5,185	3.3%	2.8%
Missing Response	995	2,606	945,944
Total valid		644	186,166	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		2,606	945,944
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Row

travel_replace_4

How many times household member would have traveled for health care services if an online alternative did not exist If used any services or activities in the past week

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 times (not at all)	0	121	43,996	25.6%	24.7%
1 time	1	301	110,444	63.8%	62.0%
2 times	2	34	15,854	7.2%	8.9%
3 times	3	13	6,667	2.8%	3.7%
4 times	4	1	268	0.2%	0.2%
5 times	5	2	975	0.4%	0.5%
Missing Response	995	2,778	953,905
Total valid		472	178,204	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		2,778	953,905
Total		3,250	1,132,109

Row

travel_replace_5

How many times household member would have traveled for other non-medical professional services (e.g., financial advising) if an online alternative did not exist If used any services or activities in the past week

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 times (not at all)	0	507	158,196	54.5%	49.8%
1 time	1	290	112,272	31.1%	35.3%
2 times	2	80	28,557	8.6%	9.0%
3 times	3	32	9,702	3.4%	3.1%
4 times	4	10	6,277	1.1%	2.0%
5 times	5	8	1,838	0.9%	0.6%
6 times	8	1	282	0.1%	0.1%
10 or more times	12	3	728	0.3%	0.2%
Missing Response	995	2,319	814,258
Total valid		931	317,852	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		2,319	814,258
Total		3,250	1,132,110

Person

Row

age

Age of household member (appended from HTS)

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Under 5	1	740	207,485	8.3%	6.9%
5-15	2	1,380	539,680	15.6%	17.8%
16-17	3	220	103,269	2.5%	3.4%
18-24	4	1,294	348,925	14.6%	11.5%
25-34	5	1,549	413,141	17.5%	13.6%
35-44	6	1,235	436,919	13.9%	14.4%
45-54	7	758	330,664	8.6%	10.9%
55-64	8	701	282,354	7.9%	9.3%
65-74	9	712	284,524	8.0%	9.4%
75-84	10	244	73,123	2.8%	2.4%
85 or older	11	30	6,954	0.3%	0.2%
Total valid		8,863	3,027,038	100.0%	100.0%
Total		8,863	3,027,038

Row

employment

Employment status (appended from HTS) if age >= 16 and surveyable

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Employed full-time (35 or more hours per week, paid)	1	2,764	1,114,705	41.0%	48.9%
Employed part-time (less than 35 hours per week, paid)	2	1,421	408,548	21.1%	17.9%
Self-employed	3	301	55,381	4.5%	2.4%
Not employed and not looking for work (e.g., retired, stay-at-home parent, student)	5	1,906	563,772	28.3%	24.7%
Unemployed and looking for work	6	226	71,216	3.4%	3.1%
Unpaid volunteer or intern	7	69	40,647	1.0%	1.8%
Employed, but not currently working (e.g., on leave, furloughed 100%)	8	56	25,604	0.8%	1.1%
Missing Response	995	2,120	747,165
Total valid		6,743	2,279,873	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		2,120	747,165
Total		8,863	3,027,038

Row

student

Student status and location (appended from HTS) if age >= 18 and surveyable

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Full-time student, currently attending some or all classes in-person	0	1,075	218,590	16.5%	10.0%
Part-time student, currently attending some or all classes in-person	1	166	43,462	2.5%	2.0%
Not a student	2	5,055	1,831,014	77.5%	84.1%
Part-time student, ONLY online classes	3	138	48,475	2.1%	2.2%
Full-time student, ONLY online classes	4	89	35,062	1.4%	1.6%
Missing Response	995	2,340	850,434
Total valid		6,523	2,176,603	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		2,340	850,434
Total		8,863	3,027,037

Row

school_type

Type of school attends (appended from HTS) if student and surveyable

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Cared for at home (no school)	1	524	126,616	15.4%	11.0%
Daycare outside home	2	72	35,687	2.1%	3.1%
Preschool	3	204	72,161	6.0%	6.3%
Elementary school (public, private, charter)	5	842	310,304	24.8%	27.1%
Middle school (public, private, charter)	6	305	132,563	9.0%	11.6%
High school (public, private, charter)	7	327	160,927	9.6%	14.0%
Vocational/technical school	10	44	17,745	1.3%	1.5%
2-year college	11	51	22,421	1.5%	2.0%
4-year college	12	627	170,197	18.5%	14.8%
Graduate or professional school	13	278	51,245	8.2%	4.5%
Other	997	118	46,886	3.5%	4.1%
Missing Response	995	5,471	1,880,285
Total valid		3,392	1,146,752	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		5,471	1,880,285
Total		8,863	3,027,037

Row

ethnicity

if age >= 18 and surveyable (Asked rMove day 4 for person_num >= 2)

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)	Missing Total (Unweighted)	Missing Total (Weighted)
Not of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin (appended from HTS)	ethnicity_1	5,248	1,710,804	88.3%	81.8%	2,918	935,704
Mexican, Mexican American, Chicano (appended from HTS)	ethnicity_2	179	116,396	3.0%	5.6%	2,918	935,704
Puerto Rican (appended from HTS)	ethnicity_3	19	14,646	0.3%	0.7%	2,918	935,704
Cuban (appended from HTS)	ethnicity_4	6	2,098	0.1%	0.1%	2,918	935,704
Another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin (appended from HTS)	ethnicity_997	155	81,045	2.6%	3.9%	2,918	935,704
Prefer not to answer (appended from HTS)	ethnicity_999	349	173,767	5.9%	8.3%	2,918	935,704

Row

race

if age >= 18 and surveyable (Asked rMove day 4 for person_num >= 2)

Label	Variable Name	Count (Unweighted)	Count (Weighted)	Percent (Unweighted)	Percent (Weighted)	Missing Total (Unweighted)	Missing Total (Weighted)
African American or Black (appended from HTS)	race_1	54	42,514	0.9%	2.0%	2,918	935,704
American Indian or Alaska Native (appended from HTS)	race_2	54	30,763	0.9%	1.5%	2,918	935,704
Asian (appended from HTS)	race_3	233	171,528	3.9%	8.2%	2,918	935,704
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (appended from HTS)	race_4	40	30,781	0.7%	1.5%	2,918	935,704
White (appended from HTS)	race_5	5,234	1,651,517	88.0%	79.0%	2,918	935,704
Other race (appended from HTS)	race_997	95	64,144	1.6%	3.1%	2,918	935,704
Prefers not to answer (appended from HTS)	race_999	360	175,585	6.1%	8.4%	2,918	935,704

Row

gender

Gender (appended from HTS) if surveyable

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Female	1	4,078	1,414,540	49.3%	48.1%
Male	2	3,899	1,388,779	47.1%	47.3%
Non-binary	3	62	23,455	0.7%	0.8%
Other/prefer to self-describe	997	17	3,839	0.2%	0.1%
Prefer not to answer	999	218	108,003	2.6%	3.7%
Missing Response	995	589	88,421
Total valid		8,274	2,938,616	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		589	88,421
Total		8,863	3,027,037

Row

job_type

Work location type (appended from HTS) if employed and surveyable

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Go to one work location ONLY (outside of home)	1	2,175	852,021	52.4%	54.1%
Work location regularly varies (different offices/jobsites)	2	404	155,041	9.7%	9.9%
Work ONLY from home or remotely (telework, self-employed)	3	681	273,059	16.4%	17.4%
Drive/bike/travel for work (driver, sales, deliveries)	4	71	19,846	1.7%	1.3%
Telework some days and travel to a work location some days	5	816	273,502	19.7%	17.4%
Missing Response	995	4,716	1,453,568
Total valid		4,147	1,573,469	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		4,716	1,453,568
Total		8,863	3,027,037

Row

work_mode

Typical mode of travel to/from work (appended from HTS) if employed and doesn’t work only from home (Asked rMove day 1)

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Walk (or jog/wheelchair)	1	147	25,400	4.6%	2.1%
Household vehicle (or motorcycle)	100	2,623	1,093,899	81.3%	88.6%
Other vehicle (e.g., friend's car, rental, work car)	101	77	39,845	2.4%	3.2%
Bus, shuttle, or vanpool	102	153	15,836	4.7%	1.3%
Bicycle or e-bicycle (personal or bikeshare)	103	82	20,039	2.5%	1.6%
Other	104	23	15,940	0.7%	1.3%
Rail (e.g., light rail, commuter rail)	105	82	8,540	2.5%	0.7%
Uber/Lyft, taxi, or car service	106	31	13,031	1.0%	1.1%
Micromobility (e.g., scooter, moped, skateboard)	107	10	1,757	0.3%	0.1%
Missing Response	995	5,635	1,792,749
Total valid		3,228	1,234,287	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		5,635	1,792,749
Total		8,863	3,027,036

Row

education

Highest level of education completed (appended from HTS) if participant (Asked rMove day 4)

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Less than high school	1	85	63,883	1.4%	3.1%
High school graduate/GED	2	510	320,607	8.6%	15.3%
Some college	3	1,154	318,897	19.4%	15.2%
Vocational/technical training	4	201	126,996	3.4%	6.1%
Associate degree	5	549	155,615	9.2%	7.4%
Bachelor's degree	6	2,041	591,023	34.3%	28.3%
Graduate/post-graduate degree	7	1,296	433,138	21.8%	20.7%
Prefer not to answer	999	109	81,175	1.8%	3.9%
Missing Response	995	2,918	935,704
Total valid		5,945	2,091,334	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		2,918	935,704
Total		8,863	3,027,038

Row

relationship

Relationship to household person number 1 (appended from HTS)

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Self	0	3,250	1,132,109	36.7%	37.4%
Spouse, partner	1	2,030	657,625	22.9%	21.7%
Child, child in-law	2	2,590	962,657	29.2%	31.8%
Parent, parent in-law	3	178	83,643	2.0%	2.8%
Sibling, sibling in-law	4	131	61,335	1.5%	2.0%
Other relative (grandchild, cousin)	5	95	41,247	1.1%	1.4%
Nonrelative (friend, roommate, household help)	6	589	88,421	6.6%	2.9%
Total valid		8,863	3,027,037	100.0%	100.0%
Total		8,863	3,027,037

Row

vehicle

Vehicle driven the most (appended from HTS) if household has >= 1 vehicle and person drives (Asked rMove day 3)

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Household vehicle 1	6	3,307	1,090,405	60.7%	56.8%
Household vehicle 2	7	1,555	572,137	28.5%	29.8%
Household vehicle 3	8	323	151,665	5.9%	7.9%
Household vehicle 4	9	92	48,076	1.7%	2.5%
Household vehicle 5	10	32	14,317	0.6%	0.7%
Household vehicle 6	11	10	2,938	0.2%	0.2%
Household vehicle 7	12	2	448	0.0%	0.0%
A carshare vehicle (e.g., ZipCar)	18	7	2,950	0.1%	0.2%
Other vehicle	997	119	36,976	2.2%	1.9%
Missing Response	995	3,416	1,107,125
Total valid		5,447	1,919,912	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		3,416	1,107,125
Total		8,863	3,027,037

Row

can_drive

Household member drives (appended from HTS) if household has >=1 participating HH member age 16+

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Yes, drives	1	5,699	2,009,723	92.5%	91.6%
No, does not drive	3	463	183,594	7.5%	8.4%
Missing Response	995	2,701	833,721
Total valid		6,162	2,193,317	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		2,701	833,721
Total		8,863	3,027,038

Row

ld_hh_member

Household member made long-distance, non-commute journeys in past four weeks

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
No	0	4,858	1,720,403	54.8%	56.8%
Yes	1	4,005	1,306,634	45.2%	43.2%
Total valid		8,863	3,027,037	100.0%	100.0%
Total		8,863	3,027,037

Row

ld_freq

How many long-distance non-commute journeys household member took in past four weeks

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 journeys	1	220	67,961	7.3%	6.9%
1 journey	2	1,404	449,783	46.5%	45.6%
2 journeys	3	737	256,933	24.4%	26.1%
3 journeys	4	272	86,431	9.0%	8.8%
4 journeys	5	154	47,074	5.1%	4.8%
5 journeys	6	64	17,413	2.1%	1.8%
6 journeys	7	31	12,327	1.0%	1.3%
7 journeys	8	8	829	0.3%	0.1%
8 journeys	9	18	7,433	0.6%	0.8%
9 journeys	10	5	1,244	0.2%	0.1%
10 journeys	11	9	4,034	0.3%	0.4%
More than 10	12	48	15,135	1.6%	1.5%
Don’t know	998	48	18,948	1.6%	1.9%
Missing Response	995	5,845	2,041,494
Total valid		3,018	985,545	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		5,845	2,041,494
Total		8,863	3,027,039

Row

ld_purpose_1

Number of leisure, recreation, or vacation long-distance non-commute journeys household member took in past four weeks If long-distance journeys > 1

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	1.000	0.795	0	20	898,635.042	2,128,402.405	2,750	6,113

Row

ld_purpose_2

Number of Social (e.g., visit family or friends) long-distance non-commute journeys household member took in past four weeks If long-distance journeys > 1

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	0.000	0.730	0	15	898,635.042	2,128,402.405	2,750	6,113

Row

ld_purpose_3

Number of personal business (e.g., medical, financial) long-distance non-commute journeys household member took in past four weeks If long-distance journeys > 1

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	0.000	0.189	0	15	898,635.042	2,128,402.405	2,750	6,113

Row

ld_purpose_4

Number of work or business (e.g., meeting, conference) for long-distance non-commute journeys household member took in past four weeks If long-distance journeys > 1

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	0.000	0.315	0	30	898,635.042	2,128,402.405	2,750	6,113

Row

ld_purpose_5

Number of college or university for long-distance non-commute journeys household member took in past four weeks If long-distance journeys > 1

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	0.000	0.043	0	20	898,635.042	2,128,402.405	2,750	6,113

Row

ld_purpose_997

Number of other purpose long-distance non-commute journeys household member took in past four weeks If long-distance journeys > 1

Min	Median	Mean	Mode	Max	Weighted N Valid	Weighted N Missing	Unweighted N Valid	Unweighted N Missing
0	0.000	0.138	0	8	898,635.042	2,128,402.405	2,750	6,113

Trip

Row

ld_mode

Mode of travel for most recent long-distance non-commute journey by household member If long-distance journeys > 1

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Own vehicle (for example: car, truck, RV)	1	2,131	24,992	77.5%	77.9%
Another vehicle (for example: rental car, company car, friend’s car)	2	272	2,930	9.9%	9.1%
Bus	3	14	129	0.5%	0.4%
Rail	4	35	230	1.3%	0.7%
Airplane	5	285	3,720	10.4%	11.6%
Other mode	997	13	94	0.5%	0.3%
Missing Response	995	3,646	43,767
Total valid		2,750	32,095	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		3,646	43,767
Total		6,396	75,862

Row

ld_trip_purpose

Purpose of most recent long-distance non-commute journey by household member If most recent trip

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Leisure, recreation, or vacation	1	1,161	14,589	42.2%	45.5%
Social (for example: visit family or friends)	2	1,012	10,592	36.8%	33.0%
Personal business (for example: medical, financial)	3	193	2,089	7.0%	6.5%
Work or business (for example: meeting, conference)	4	223	2,545	8.1%	7.9%
Attend college or university	5	10	180	0.4%	0.6%
Other purpose	997	151	2,099	5.5%	6.5%
Missing Response	995	3,646	43,767
Total valid		2,750	32,094	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		3,646	43,767
Total		6,396	75,861

Row

ld_num_travelers

Number of people that traveled with household member on most recent long-distance non-commute journey If long-distance journeys > 1

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
0 (Traveled alone)	1	592	7,408	21.5%	23.1%
1 other person	2	1,169	12,619	42.5%	39.3%
2 other people	3	351	4,318	12.8%	13.5%
3 or more other people	4	638	7,749	23.2%	24.1%
No value assigned	NA	3,646	43,767
Total valid		2,750	32,094	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		3,646	43,767
Total		6,396	75,861

Row

ld_depart_time

Departure time for most recent long-distance non-commute journey by household member If long-distance journeys > 1

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Midnight – 3:00 a.m.	1	12	198	0.4%	0.6%
3:00 a.m. – 5:59 a.m.	2	138	1,862	5.0%	5.8%
6:00 a.m. – 8:59 a.m.	3	582	6,999	21.2%	21.8%
9:00 a.m. – 2:59 p.m.	4	1,262	14,253	45.9%	44.4%
3:00 p.m. – 5:59 p.m.	5	542	6,093	19.7%	19.0%
6:00 p.m. – 11:59 p.m.	6	214	2,688	7.8%	8.4%
Missing Response	995	3,646	43,767
Total valid		2,750	32,093	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		3,646	43,767
Total		6,396	75,860

Row

ld_return_time

Return time for most recent long-distance non-commute journey by household member If long-distance journeys > 1

Label	Value	Unweighted Count	Weighted Count	Unweighted Percent	Weighted Percent
Midnight – 3:00 a.m.	1	73	1,086	2.7%	3.4%
3:00 a.m. – 5:59 a.m.	2	22	352	0.8%	1.1%
6:00 a.m. – 8:59 a.m.	3	41	483	1.5%	1.5%
9:00 a.m. – 2:59 p.m.	4	394	4,698	14.3%	14.6%
3:00 p.m. – 5:59 p.m.	5	903	10,872	32.8%	33.9%
6:00 p.m. – 11:59 p.m.	6	1,317	14,604	47.9%	45.5%
Missing Response	995	3,646	43,767
Total valid		2,750	32,095	100.0%	100.0%
Total missing		3,646	43,767
Total		6,396	75,862

Overview

Row

Overview

2023 Utah Moves Transportation Follow-On Survey: Unweighted Codebook and Dataset Guide

Dataset Composition

Dataset Composition

Data Privacy

Data Privacy

Using The Data

Column

Joining Tables

Joining Tables

Missing Values

Missing Values

Data Visualization

Data Visualization

Codebook

Row

Variable Descriptions

Variable Values

Household

Sidebar

Household

Row

sample_segment

Row

num_people

Row

num_surveyable

Row

num_kids

Row

num_workers

Row

num_vehicles

Row

income_broad

Row

income_imputed

Row

residence_rent_own

Row

res_type

Row

commute_pref

Row

congestion_pref

Row

speed_pref

Row

investment_1

Row

investment_2

Row

investment_3

Row

investment_4

Row

investment_5

Row

investment_6

Row

investment_7

Row

investment_8

Row

investment_9

Row

new_home_type

Row

current_home_loc

Row

pref_home_loc

Row

current_home_type

Row

pref_home_type

Row

trip_purpose

Row